Thu 30 Mar 2006
There has been a lot of talk around lately about how Microsoft’s new Origami/UMPC might be the solution to everyone’s mobile computing needs. I normally don’t write about this kind of thing but the conversation has really gotten me thinking.
It seems that a lot of people within the tablet community are frustrated because they’ve realized that they’re not using their tablets as much as they’d like to because they aren’t taking them everywhere they might need them. The general consensus is that a smaller device would be more likely to make the trip, therefore giving them more use and more productivity. As a general rule this makes sense to me, but I still have one major issue with the concept - a UMPC still can’t fit in your pocket. (I have partially been corrected once, though I also consider it somewhat of a joke.)I just can’t see myself whipping one of those things out at a moment’s notice, and unless you’re a European Carry-All owner, I can’t imagine this would go many more places than a slightly larger, more functional tablet.
As I’ve posted in the past, my primary computing device is a Lenovo X41 Tablet and I recently added a PPC-6700 Windows Mobile 5 phone. I just can’t see a UMPC replacing either of these devices for me. It’s not going to replace my X41 because I wouldn’t be able to touch-type on it, and Bluetooth keyboards can be forgotten. They also don’t stand a change against my PPC-6700 due to it’s large size and no phone component.
Really, the only ultra-small device that I’d consider is the cPC from DualCor. This device reminds me a lot of a Sony U70 with a phone built in. This device, still has the size problem but at least it could replace my PPC-6700 as my PDA/Phone and it would make quick notes really easy with full XP Tablet and OneNote.
After really evaluating how I use my devices my ideal gadget would be my PPC-6700 with a 20gb hard drive and automatic OneNote sync with my Tablet. I rarely find myself places needing to jot down more than a minor note, so the thumb-board on the PPC-6700 is perfect, and it also has voice recording, so with OneNote 2007 and it’s audio transcribing features, I’ll be covered, and any serious computing could be done with my X41 Tablet. I just am not that reliant on full versions of word/acrobat/excel/etc. that I really need a full PC all the time.
I guess I just feel these devices fall in no-mans-land. Too big to replace a phone or PDA and too small to be a serious laptop replacement. Be serious for a second and imagine looking at a 7″ screen for more than a couple of minutes at a time and imagine if you could get any work done without a headache.
Now don’t get me wrong, I think the UMPC/Origami devices are WAY cool - I just don’t see how they can fill any gaps for me. My only guess as to the target demographic is someone who has a desktop pc and a normal phone. Then, these could be slipped into a briefcase very easily and toted around instead of a legal pad, then synchronized with the desktop when needed.
The only other two uses I can think of are more hobby-type activites:
- A really cool, easy to install CarPC.
- Awesome remote for home automation.
Time will tell, but I think the MOTR guys had it right when they talked about these being more of a catalyst to make people aware of the way small computing devices can change the way they work.

March 31st, 2006 at 1:04 am |
[…] UMPC: The Future of Computing Vince Anido says he doesn’t blog much about mobile computing but I am glad he wrote his opinions today titled: Is the UMPC/Origami the future?: It seems that a lot of people within the tablet community are frustrated because they’ve realized that they’re not using their tablets as much as they’d like to because they aren’t taking them everywhere they might need them. The general consensus is that a smaller device would be more likely to make the trip, therefore giving them more use and more productivity.This may be the case for some Tableteers but I have am hopeful that a 2 pound computer is easier to carry than a 5 pound. I would prefer a 14” digitzed screen that is very thin but I will give the Ultra Mobile PC (UMPC) a chance to see if maybe the system fits better into the way I work. Published Friday, March 31, 2006 4:04 AM by LPH […]
March 31st, 2006 at 7:14 am |
my question is: have you ever carry a Pocket PC in your pocket? Because in 5 years using PPCs I never have carried them in my pockets, I carry them in my belt. So, why I should care about Origamis not being “pocketables”?
March 31st, 2006 at 12:20 pm |
I actually carry one in my pocket every day. My PPC-6700 fits in my front pockets nicely, and I actually prefer carrying it there to a belt clip as I feel it’s more secure.
Many people do prefer using those belt clips, but how well would a UMPC fit in one of those? Could you carry one of those on your belt? At 1-2 lbs I’d think they’d weigh you down quite a bit.
March 31st, 2006 at 12:25 pm |
No I wont carry it in my belt. I’ll carry in a leather folder as it’s a book that I’m carrying. I don’t have any problem doing that. About a Pocket PC in the front pocket, I usually carry there keys and keys could damage my Pocket PC quit easily so I never carry them in that way.
March 31st, 2006 at 1:25 pm |
Carrying it in hand is certainly an option for some people. Personally, I don’t worry about keys with my WM5 phone because I carry my keys in my left pocket and the phone in the right, with my wallet in my back pocket.
I wouldn’t be opposed to trying something like this out for a time, because I know there are usage models that it compliments nicely. I just don’t think those applications are very large ones.
I assume you’ve ordered one? I’ve added you to my aggregator, so I’ll be following your experiences. I’d love to find an excuse to get one of them, it’s just that none are readily applicable to my needs…yet.
March 31st, 2006 at 3:54 pm |
Yes, I ordered one. I’m a developer and I need to be connected to Internet taking care of my business all time. A PPC works but when I have to take care of tech support questions that require me to check the code of my programs or when I have to create a little patch to fix a bug I have to wait until I can go back to my main PC. An UMPC will take care off these problems.
The UMPC will not replace my PPC but will take care of those things that I can’t do in a PPC.
I guess that all depends of what are the individual needs of each person. Are Origamis the future? For some yes, for how many, I would say that a large amount once the price of them goes down.
April 1st, 2006 at 11:24 am |
Rather tangential to this, albeit somewhat apropos, have you any experience with AlphaSmarts and their iterations (e.g. the Dana)? I need a device for a PC/laptop-savvy Aspie boy … and can’t decide among their options. Their site is a little cumbersome, but there are a lot of add-ons listed in various places through-out. I have wondered if some of the other solutions you address in your blogpost might be a better idea….
http://www.alphasmart.com/
April 1st, 2006 at 12:26 pm |
I’m generally not a big fan of proprietary devices, however I know relatively little about Asperger syndrome. You mentioned that he is already tech-savvy, so it seems like he would be able to use traditional gadgets quite well.
There are literally thousands of options if you decide to go that route. What gadgets does he already have/have access to? A desktop? If so, one of these Origami devices might be really good for him. Their base configurations are going to be very close to the price point of the Dana device.
What kind of things do you want him to be able to do? Does he use the Dana device somewhere else, like at school? If so, the Dana might be better because he’s familiar with it, which I know can be important.
April 12th, 2006 at 11:53 am |
Hey, Vince … sorry for my delay here. Anyway, you said something really important that had not yet registered for me: “proprietary devices”. I’m not a fan either — really good point; thank-you. He has a laptop, a desktop, a printer, a cell phone, but I am trying to broaden his horizons. At school, he uses a regular desktop during computer lab, but for all his other work, they want him to use his handwriting … to work on it … and NOT use a keyboard. He’s really into written fonts [read: kewl] and they want him to practice just regular writing [whatever that is ;} ]. Many thanks again; you really helped clarify things.
April 12th, 2006 at 11:58 am |
I’m so glad I could help. Since he has all those other devices, and his teachers want him to practice handwriting more, it seems that he would be a prime candidate for a UMPC. Let me know how things work out.